01
Three search principles, different strengths
Compare BM25 for term matching, vectors for semantic similarity and graphs for modeled relationships.
Keynote / Search & Retrieval
BM25, vector search and graphs answer different kinds of questions. Using accessible examples, the talk lays out their strengths and limits, and shows when a combination makes more sense than searching for the one best method.
Who it’s for
For IT and data leaders, architects, and teams planning enterprise search or knowledge-based AI applications.
Content framework
We tailor the focus and technical depth to your question.
01
Compare BM25 for term matching, vectors for semantic similarity and graphs for modeled relationships.
02
Discuss with examples how the question and the data shape the choice of a method or a combination.
03
Treat relevance, source quality, access rights and freshness as criteria for a robust search solution.
How I work
This simplified example shows how sources and follow-up questions narrow down an answer. It is not a search benchmark and not a performance comparison of BM25, vector and graph search. We assess the right approach based on your questions and data.
Explore the workflow with curated, fictional sample data, fully local and without a live LLM.
The example answer is ready.
Knowledge question · retrieval architecture · conceptual
02 / Retrieve sources in parallel
Example text on semantic search and context-based answers.
Document → product → version → responsible team.
Not needed for this question
Not needed for this question
Combine relevant results and make the limits of the answer visible.
Vector search can find passages with similar content. A knowledge graph adds explicit relationships, for example between document, product and version. That can help narrow down the right context. The benefit depends on modeling and data quality; a graph does not guarantee a correct answer.
What would this look like with your documents? In the Machine-Readability Check, we examine your knowledge foundation and the next steps.
Request a workshop proposal →Before you inquire
The keynote format runs 45–60 minutes. Alternatives within the offering are a 20-minute talk, a 90-minute deep dive with Q&A, or a panel by arrangement.
Fee from €6,500 plus VAT and travel. International €8,500–12,000 plus VAT. All fees plus VAT.
I speak fluent English. All offerings and intro calls are available in German and English.
Yes. Keynotes are available on-site and remotely; just mention your preferred setting in your inquiry.
The focus depends on the audience. Leadership teams get a strategic perspective; technical teams can go deeper into retrieval, graphs and agentic workflows.
No. The talks explain architectural principles. Neo4j and LangGraph serve as concrete examples; you do not need to use these tools already.
Helpful details are your preferred date, venue or setting, audience and size, topic, and the language you want. Availability is checked case by case.

Your next step
We tailor examples and depth to your search problem and your audience. No prior knowledge of search algorithms is required.
Tell me about your audience or team, your question and a preferred date. On that basis, we clarify format and scope.
See the workshop on this topic